Staff / Principal Rust Engineer, AI Coding Agent Evaluator
G2i Inc. $208K–$416K/yr
Software Development · 201-500 employees
About the role
Evaluate the quality and reasoning of AI-generated coding interactions to ensure they align with strong engineering judgment. Provide clear, opinionated feedback on the effectiveness and trustworthiness of AI coding agents.
What they look for
Requirements
Requires Staff or Principal-level engineering experience with deep familiarity in modern AI-assisted development workflows. Candidates must possess strong technical judgment and the ability to assess AI outputs without needing to execute every line of code.
Full description
Senior AI Interaction Evaluator (Codex / Claude Code)
Contract | $100–$200/hour | 10–20 hrs/week | Start ASAP (through early May)
Check out this Loom video for more details!
We’re looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.
This is not a traditional engineering role.
You won’t be writing production code. You’ll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.
What This Role Actually Is
You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios — focusing on:
- Whether the response makes sense
- Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
- Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment
- Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer
This role is about engineering taste — not syntax correctness.
What You’ll Be Doing
- Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end
- Judge whether outputs are:
- Useful
- Correct (at a high level)
- Aligned with how a strong engineer would think
- Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just code
- Distinguish between different levels of response quality (e.g. what makes something a 2 vs 4)
- Provide clear, opinionated feedback on:
- What worked
- What didn’t
- What felt “off” or misleading
- Help define what great looks like when interacting with tools like Cursor
What We Mean by “Taste”
We’re specifically looking for engineers who can answer questions like:
- Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
- Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
- Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?
- Would this interaction build or erode trust?
You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments.
Who You Are
- Staff / Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)
- Strong background in one of the below:
- TypeScript / JavaScript
- Python
- Hands-on experience using:
- OpenAI Codex
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows
- Able to evaluate code without needing to fully execute or deeply review every line
- Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback
- High bar for what “good engineering” looks like
Nice to Have
- Experience with tools like Cursor or similar AI-first IDEs
- Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows
- Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards
Engagement Details
- Rate: $100–$200/hour
- Hours: ~10–20 hours/week
- Duration: Through early May (with possible extension)
- Start: ASAP
- Process:
- Take-home evaluation exercise
- One behavioral interview
Similar roles
-
QA Automation Engineer - Rust, GxP
Nagarro Poland
-
Senior Rust Engineer
ERNI Spain Madrid, Madrid Community, Spain
-
Senior Rust Developer — Qt Bridge for Rust
Spyrosoft Wrocław, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland · PLN 250K–PLN 364K/yr
-
Senior Rust Data Engineer
Nagarro Poland
-
Rust Senior Software Engineer – Bare Metal as a Service & Datacenter Networking
Mirantis Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland
-
Senior Rust Systems Engineer – Embedded Proxy & Appliance
Securly Pune City Subdistrict, Maharashtra, India